[Vimprobable-users] gt/gT patch for better tabbed integration
thomas at xteddy.org
Mon Aug 9 21:12:56 GMT 2010
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 11:11:17PM +0200, Raphael Nestler wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 04:34:42PM +0200, Thomas Adam wrote:
> > 2010/8/9 Hannes Schüller <hannes at yllr.net>:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > Raphael Nestler <rnestler at hsr.ch> wrote:
> > >> On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 03:06:54PM +0200, Thomas Adam wrote:
> > >> > On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 02:03:09PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
> > >> > > On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 03:11:45PM +0200, Raphael Nestler wrote:
> > >> > > > It's the first time I've used the Xlib functions directly, so
> > >> > > > maybe the code could be made cleaner.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Can you regenerate this diff against latest HEAD? It doesn't
> > >> > > apply cleanly
> > >>
> > >> I used git diff origin/HEAD to generate the diff. Is this the correct
> > >> way or is there any better method?
> > >
> > > Thomas, for your information, Raphael is obviously using the
> > > vimprobable1 branch where all his patches are applying just fine.
> > Ah, of course! That would explain it. Thanks.
> > Raphael, please can I have some patches against origin/vimprobable2?
> So here is v4 of my patch, both for vimprobable1 and 2 :)
Hannes -- go ahead and apply this, it looks fine.
Raphael -- good job!
> I couldn't directly diff against origin/vimprobable2 since it would diff
> the whole changes between vimprobable1 and 2. So I cloned vimprobable2
> and applied the patch manually.
> Btw: Are there any plans to deprecate vimprobable1? It doesn't seem to
> make sense to maintain both in a long run.
Maybe. Depends on how many users are using vimprobable1.
-- Thomas Adam
"Deep in my heart I wish I was wrong. But deep in my heart I know I am
not." -- Morrissey ("Girl Least Likely To" -- off of Viva Hate.)
More information about the Vimprobable-users